Home     Archive     Subscribe     Contact Search

Marketplace

Reid Supply

Posted on January 29, 2010.
Reid SupplyWhy the Democrats on the intention of cutting off our supply of energy?

No drilling offshore. No pipelines in Alaska. No nuclear power plants. No Coal. No new oil refineries. No wind as Teddy Kennedy can see them. And now, the Democratic leader Reid says no to oil shale. Do not miss, they gas lines, shortages, rationing and the speed limit 55 mph Carter inflicted on us?

http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cf ...

BAD RED M - If you actually listened to Rush, rather than demonize, you understand that it is logical. Why cut off a major source of energy, while investing in alternatives?

The Democratic Party has been taken over by the envionmentalists over-the-top, lobbyists and interest groups that have a lot of money.

I am for alternative fuels, but we also need to drill. It is a guaranteed source .... alternatives are not yet sure thing.

It's very simple if they can control energy resources in America so they can control the people.
For the poster above me Bush has lifted the ban on drilling direction before the Liberals went on vacation lazy. The only reason the Democrats have decided to let the ban on offshore drilling run is because it is an election year.If we do not vote the bums liberal Washington, when they return in January I can assure you that you and everyone the Democrats absolutely sure we are all freezing and starving.

you are clueless

1. The moratorium on offshore drilling that recently expired.
The oil companies have deliberately not spend billions of dollars
on offshore platforms, because they knew that the economy was declining.
2. There are already many pipelines in Alaska Hello???
3. We already get 20% of our nuclear power and Yucca Mt
store waste more than cannot
4.Wind power comes from receiving tax incentives by a law passed bypartisan
Ted Ken cannot do something
5. U.S. has many oil refineries, but hurricanes cause judgments.
Cannot Stop or the shortage of gasoline from it.
6.Oil Shale is not fiscally sustainable. It cost a lot to produce.It costs $ 60 dollars to produce a barrel. Can only diesel fuel. Takes a huge amount of water to operate

www.pickensplan.com is bi-partisan support that effort nat gas, wind and solar will end our addiction to oil

Because continuing to ignore the fact that oil is a finite resource (there is only so much of it), is ultimately a policy that will cripple America.

It is now time to at least begin to Weening dependence on oil while we are not economically dead in the water cuz the oil has disappeared or is too expensive to use more wayyyyyyy.

This is really not that difficult. Consider turning down the volume on Rush Limbaugh from time to time. You can actually learn something true.

Messy Jes: LoL ... I listened to Rush ... Try not to live in a prejudiced world darling, it would do you good. Rush is simply wrong. And whoever gives him credibility on issues of science or technology of energy is stupid. The man is an abandonment ... how do you really expect to understand anything?

The facts are that the technology is there. The only thing impeding the implementation thereof, the financing of infrastructure changes.

Now, please MessyJes listen ... I (unfortunately) agree that we need to drill bit now, because we need a bridge to that future ... but not only non-regulated, over-drilling, nothing legislation. It's dangerous, and simply to perpetuate an ideology very imperfect.

Again ... try to receive the truth from someone other than a party political hack insane. Rush is an idiot.

You really need to read the news.

Share |

Comments

There are no comments.

Leave a Comment

Your Name
Your Email
Comments
Human Check. Type 5869.

Most Recent
Upholstery Sydney
Rimowa Werksverkauf
Modec International
Children's Party Supplies
Trend Detergent
Dog Compost
Madonna Taschen
Jeanstaschen

Other Blogs
Bake Things
Blood Sucking
Food Wick
Meal Foods
Gift Tab
Card Boat
Gift Clicks
Health Supply
Health Drugs
Crisp Healthcare
Health Directs
Healthy Hart